Posted by: Tom Triumph | May 25, 2009

39. This England: from Richard II: William Shakespeare

I am amazed at how confused my students get in analyzing this poem. To me, it seems quite obvious. Yet, they start talking about Mars the planet, and half of them do not have the biblical background to even know what Eden is, and then they take the precious stone as being literal. In the end, their pieces are a mess of misunderstanding.

Still, it is a baseline. This serves as a teachable moment; a place to begin.

I use it as an introduction to nationalism and the western world. How does it compare to great American poems and songs? Remember, this is but a piece from a play.

This England: from Richard II
William Shakespeare

This royal throne of kings, this scepter’d isle,
This earth of majesty, this seat of Mars,
This other Eden, demi-paradise,
This fortress built by Nature for herself
Against infection and the hand of war,
This happy breed of men, this little world,
This precious stone set in the silver sea,
Which serves it in the office of a wall,
Or as a moat defensive to a house,
Against the envy of less happier lands,
This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England,

Advertisements

Responses

  1. Middle school being a transitional stage for most young minds in the very ability to understand the sorts of metaphor that underpin this poetic speech, it should be no surprise that some will still be baffled by “this precious stone,” and indeed, all of it. It is not that they know not of Eden, they know Eden as only biblical. They know Mars as the planet, not its mythical god namesake, or further, his association with bellicose power.

    How can you teach about the nuances of patriotism, about accepting such disparate and conflicting notions as antagonism toward others mixed with defense from others, when you need to explain how these notions are even present in the language? When you’ve convinced yourself that your students can intrinsically understand metaphor and allegory, then you can use this poem for what you intend. Before that they’ll be as baffled as if it were in a foreign language, rife with non-literalisms and subtle modes of thought beyond their ken, because it is.

    • Good points. To a degree, I won’t disagree about readiness, but I would argue that the struggle is where the learning happens. If you wait until “they can intrinsically understand metaphor and allegory” you will be waiting a long time. Only through the struggle, the challenge of Eden being a metaphor and not a biblical place, does their mind expand. That is how the mind expands.

      Unfortunately, I meet a lot of middle school teachers, coordinators and administrators who won’t tackle such text because their students do not have all of their ducks in a row. Our SU tends to push such things to the high school (which, in turn, is pushing towards college), regardless of the Common Core says. Learning is messy. I probably misrepresented myself in my post–I am always surprised by the holes in their cultural currency, but also know that they exist and that the movement towards the abstract is beginning and comes out in all sorts of ugly, messy, beautiful ways.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: